Facebook announced that they stop moderating content, or fact checking.
Apparently they follow the new vision of Trump and Elon musk. But let's not forget that X is censored more than ever, and there is strong evidence that Elon musk is controlling the algorithms directly.
Should social media platform monitor and curate the content posted by users? For accuracy, nudity, violence, or hate speech?
More freedom of expression, or more content control? Ministry of truth, or jungle of fake news?
It's complicated.
We probably want to be somewhere in the middle.
Facebook and all platforms have always done a terrible job at fact checking or content checking. They censored classical paintings because of nudity, never really understood sarcasm, and still allow huge amounts of fake news and scam messages.
And the legal implications are also complicated. Is the platform responsible for the content? Then who is?
In The Good Wife legal series, there is an episode in which "ChumHum" (a mix of Google and Fb platform) argues that the content posted by users is free speech. And the judge says that in this case, the platform is also liable for defamation suits.
The scene goes something like this: (source)
"And does he have proof they stole it? “You mean actual ‘proof”?” he wonders. Hell no. “But I don’t need it. It’s my opinion.” “Mr. Gross is claiming editorial discretion for his search engine; therefore, he is responsible for its editorial contents.”
“Oh, wait a minute,” Viola calls out, bring the Valley Girl hands out again. They can’t have their cake and eat it too, Your Honor, Alicia shrugs. “If they insist on free speech protections, then they are responsible for that speech.” The Honorable Michael Marx is flat out laughing now. “Your Honor!” Viola whines, but she doesn’t get any further than that. “No, Miss Walsh, she’s right.” Ha! Take that, nonsensical tactic!
“So, Mr. Costas, you printed the plagiarism accusation without checking truth or falsehood?” I did, he says proudly. “I didn’t need to.” Tool. Are we making Gross responsible for everything written on the internet now? Just checking. “And did he give anyone at ChumHum his reasons or evidence?” Um, no, he sneers, looking around the court as if imagining cheers and high fives.
“Your Honor, this is absurd,” Viola finally gets on her feet. “ChumHum has millions of pages; if my client is going to be held responsible for every single one…” Yes. Absurd, isn’t it? “Well then there’ll be a hell of a lot of defamation suits,” Alicia laughs, and the judge agrees. Sorry, but that’s what you get for making a free speech argument, love.