American checks and balances: the next world order

 The American democracy is a special construction. It is based on a complex set of checks and balances, built into the Constitution from the very beginning, with the precise purpose of preventing a single man or an interest group from seizing power.

This worked very well until now.

During Trump’s first term, it worked surprisingly well. American judges were still independent. Civil servants, police officers, and FBI agents were still independent. Prosecutors opened investigations against their own superiors.

Parliament blocked military or budgetary decisions of the presidency. The army said that the laws do not allow the execution of just any order given by the president.

Now it no longer works. I am shocked by this simple sentence: the American system of checks and balances, which was supposed to protect American democracy, collapsed after Trump’s second election.

The American democratic system has collapsed entirely. There are no more checks and balances.

It is somewhat similar to the rise of Octavian Augustus.

Caesar still pretended to listen to the Senate, but Octavian put an end to those foolish ideas, declared himself a God, and stopped the nonsense about Democracy, the Republic, and the Senate.

This is where we are now.

Trump has put an end to the nonsense about Democracy, the Republic, and the Senate.

I must underline that Trump will not be the first imperator of America. He is too old, too senile. He does not see far enough ahead. He is happy just making a bit more money with trumpcoin or penguicoin.

Not even Trump’s children will be the first American dictators. They are incompetent.

The next imperator of America will be a grandson of Vance, Thiel, or Musk. Someone who will get hold of an artillery division at the right moment, like Napoleon or Octavian, and will declare “the Consulate.” And then will occupy the Senate entirely, to the cheers of the masses.

The American dictatorship will most likely bring global stability in the medium term. The supremacy of America at the global level, as a world empire.

Much like the supremacy of the Roman Empire.

We are heading toward a Pax Americana lasting several hundred years.

I believe this will be a good thing for our children and grandchildren.

Their lives will be characterized by peace, under the umbrella of an American dictatorship and supremacy over the entire world.

The Metaverse is officially dead

Mark Z. officially confirmed the death of the Metaverse. Fired the full team. Closed the project. A failure of 70 bil. USD. 

We all knew that it wouldn't work. 

I said it wouldn't work, from before testing the VR headset.

I confirmed that it doesn't work after buying and testing the VR kit. 

E.g https://blog.stefanmorcov.com/2023/03/the-metaverse-is-dead.html

The technology is not there yet. VR quality and feeling is low, like a smartphone from 2002. Low resolution and image quality. No solution for a keyboard or mouse. No integration with desktop or mobile. 

No business use case or benefit.

No serious advantage over using a phone or computer, and paying in Eur/ USD.

Which led to a shocking lack of content: no business applications, no 3D movies (!!), few and poor 3D games.

A friend gave me the best illustration of the uselessness of the technology. He was using the VR headset for (1) playing ping-pong with his brother - who lives next door, and (2) watching movies with his girlfriend - in the same room.

I strongly believe in the future of VR. But we need another Steve Jobs to revolutionize the technology and concept.

About Work, Personal Life, and Values

Holidays are coming. People debate how many days off we need, or deserve.

At the heart of this discussion there are two distinct layers.

1. A Set of Practical Problems. 

Very concrete, pragmatic questions:

Why do public-sector employees need more vacation days than those in the private sector?

Why do they receive special pensions?

Who actually works on January 5th?

Why is January 6th a public holiday?

Is “making up” lost workdays a real practice, or just a global illusion?

Do we need 35 or 56 holidays per year? 30 or 50 work hours per week?

These are not minor details. They affect productivity, fairness, and how we organize our economic life.

2. A Question of Principle — and Culture

Beyond the practicalities, there’s a deeper issue at stake: a cultural one.

What values do we truly believe in and promote as a society?

Do we value work and results?

Or do we prioritize free time, rest, and relaxation?

It’s an interesting topic—and a nuanced one.

There’s a popular urban myth that corporatists (and public servants) have job security, stable income, unions, and a comfortable 9-to-5 schedule. But that’s not always how it works.

Sometimes it means working so hard your head spins—and carrying unused vacation days for five years straight. At one point, I personally had accumulated around a hundred unused vacation days. I’ve even forgotten the exact number (today, that wouldn’t be legal anymore).

I was working roughly 14 hours a day, weekends included. Those hours didn’t count, of course—we weren’t allowed to record them officially. And yet, it was fine.

I fit that lifestyle well. So did most in my generation, and many of those who build careers in corporations, in the Big Four, in McKinsey, KPMG, GE, and similar.

Also, Entrepreneurship Isn’t Always Burnout

Entrepreneurship doesn’t always mean working 20 hours a day without vacations.

Some people choose entrepreneurship—or, more often, freelancing—precisely because they want 60 days of vacation per year. Of course, not the same people who thrive on nonstop work.

Surely, the big advantage of entrepreneurship remains true: on weekends, you can start your workday whenever you want.

Back to the Core Question

What are the values of our society?

Do we prioritize free time and personal life?

Or work and results?

The answer isn’t simple—and perhaps it shouldn’t be. But it’s a conversation worth having.

Science works: the GPS case

 Relativity theory is a great practical example of how, and why, science actually works.

Science is true because it works *). Science allows us to drive cars, fly airplanes, make video-calls, cure diseases, and save lives.

But science requires education to be discussed. Otherwise it's like magic **). People without scientific education cannot understand its language, and cannot distinguish science from magic. 

This is how you get stupid conspiracy theories, religion, and antivaxers.

As a great example, here's a great story about our GPS navigation. 

You know, we open Google maps or Waze on our phone, and it gives us precise directions on how to get home. Behind this every day tool there's an incredible amount of another and engineering. 

Gps positioning works by measuring and comparing frequencies of signals sent by satellites. 

There are 30 GPS Satellites orbiting the Earth. Designing satellites and sending them to orbit the earth is an incredible scientific and engineering accomplishment in itself. 

Each satellite broadcasts towards Earth a signal with: the satellite’s location in space, and the exact time the signal was sent. 

Each phone has a GPS receiver that continuously listens to the signals from 2-4 satellites, and continuously measures its distance from them based on the time needed by the signal to reach the phone. Then the phone calculates its own position, based on 1-4 such distances (theoretically min 4 for correct trilateration, but you can get reasonable estimations with less, if using additional local data such as GSM towers and wifi-s).

And the beauty part? Nothing would work without taking into account Einstein's theory of relativity. 

Because the clock of each satellite is slightly different from the clock of your phone and the time on Earth. Because satellites move faster, and their gravity field is lower.

So the time of their signals must be continuously updated to account for this difference.

This is why we know that relativity theory works. Because we can place satellites in orbit with precision, and we can then calculate the position of every phone also with incredible precision, by adjusting for the time difference between objects in space, correctly predicted by Einstein 100 years ago, when there were no satellites, phones or GPS.

Why I Don't Believe in the Pension System (Even Though I'm Pro-Social Policies)

I'm very socialist when it comes to pensions — and broadly, when it comes to education, research, healthcare, and social safety nets. I deeply believe in the state’s responsibility to provide basic protections for its citizens.

But in most other areas, I’m quite capitalist. I believe in market dynamics, personal responsibility, and economic freedom.

That’s exactly why I don’t believe in the pension system — not Pillar I, not Pillar II, not Pillar III.

Pillar I: Social safety net, not a real pension.

Let’s be honest: Pillar I is not a retirement savings plan. It’s a social assistance mechanism — and that’s okay! It’s like unemployment benefits, public education, or universal healthcare. It’s meant to be a safety net for the elderly, to ensure a minimum standard of living in old age.

But let’s stop pretending it’s a “contributive” system. It never was, and it never will be. It has never been financially sustainable. It runs on political promises, electoral cycles, and constant state patchwork. It’s been eroded consistently — especially through inflation, special pensions, and arbitrary decisions by the state.

So yes, it’s a socialist system — and that’s fine. But it’s not what people are told it is.

Pillar II: State-controlled investment? That’s not real investment.

Pillar II was supposed to be a privately managed pension fund. In reality, it’s state-controlled. And I’ve never trusted a system where the state tells me how to invest my own money.

That’s not investment. That’s just another political instrument.

I’ve always been certain that the state will eventually seize or redirect those funds — and so far, it’s doing exactly that. It controls where and how the money is invested, how and when it can be withdrawn, and whether we’ll even see it again.

I’m convinced we won’t. Pillar II was just electoral marketing.

In short, we need to rethink how we talk about pensions. We need to stop mixing the language of "social protection" with "financial independence".